| Title |
Leadership Development Programs for Physicians: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-3141-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan C. Frich, Amanda L. Brewster, Emily J. Cherlin, Elizabeth H. Bradley |
| Abstract |
Physician leadership development programs typically aim to strengthen physicians' leadership competencies and improve organizational performance. We conducted a systematic review of medical literature on physician leadership development programs in order to characterize the setting, educational content, teaching methods, and learning outcomes achieved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 26% |
| Canada | 7 | 17% |
| Norway | 5 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 36% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 36% |
| Scientists | 6 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 468 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 8% |
| Researcher | 38 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 115 | 24% |
| Unknown | 151 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 28% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 43 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 6% |
| Psychology | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 10% |
| Unknown | 167 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#860,831
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#696
of 8,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,092
of 365,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#14
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.