| Title |
Advantages and limitations of multiple-trait genomic prediction for Fusarium head blight severity in hybrid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-017-3029-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Albert W. Schulthess, Yusheng Zhao, C. Friedrich H. Longin, Jochen C. Reif |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Philippines | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 30% |
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 64% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,493,896
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1,161
of 4,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,421
of 449,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#25
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.