You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Methodologies for the Examination of Water in GPCRs
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 10 |
| Book title |
Computational Methods for GPCR Drug Discovery
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7465-8_10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7464-1, 978-1-4939-7465-8
|
| Authors |
Andrea Bortolato, Benjamin G. Tehan, Robert T. Smith, Jonathan S. Mason |
| Abstract |
The following chapter examines some of the current "state-of-the-art" tools for predicting, scoring, and examining explicit water molecules in proteins and protein/ligand complexes, highlighting some of the ways information can be readily examined in a manner that is useful in a drug discovery process. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Turkey | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 7 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,060,095
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,787
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,402
of 442,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#156
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.