| Title |
A systematic review on tracheostomy decannulation: a proposal of a quantitative semiquantitative clinical score
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2466-14-201 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierachille Santus, Andrea Gramegna, Dejan Radovanovic, Rita Raccanelli, Vincenzo Valenti, Dimitri Rabbiosi, Michele Vitacca, Stefano Nava |
| Abstract |
Tracheostomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in critical care patient management; more specifically, ventilation through tracheal cannula allows removal of the endotracheal tube (ETT). Available literature about tracheostomy care and decannulation is mainly represented by expert opinions and no certain knowledge arises from it. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nicaragua | 1 | 20% |
| Philippines | 1 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 51 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 59 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,584,373
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#147
of 1,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,722
of 354,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.