| Title |
Quality of life in sarcopenia measured with the SarQoL®: impact of the use of different diagnosis definitions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40520-017-0866-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte Beaudart, Médéa Locquet, Jean-Yves Reginster, Laura Delandsheere, Jean Petermans, Olivier Bruyère |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| France | 3 | 14% |
| Brazil | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,353,622
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#252
of 1,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,873
of 448,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.