You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A study protocol of a randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of a symptom self‐management programme for people with acute myocardial infarction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Advanced Nursing, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jan.12594 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Piyanee Klainin-Yobas, Karen Wei Ling Koh, Anand Adinath Ambhore, Ping Chai, Sally Wai-Chi Chan, Hong-Gu He |
| Abstract |
To report a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial examining if a symptom self-management programme helps patients with acute myocardial infarction self-manage their physical and psychological symptoms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 175 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 51 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 22% |
| Psychology | 26 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 59 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2016.
All research outputs
#21,997,751
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#5,342
of 5,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,177
of 363,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#60
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.