↓ Skip to main content

Use of Probiotics and Oral Health

Overview of attention for article published in Current Oral Health Reports, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
Title
Use of Probiotics and Oral Health
Published in
Current Oral Health Reports, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40496-017-0159-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert P. Allaker, Abish S. Stephen

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to critically assess recent studies concerning the use of probiotics to control periodontal diseases, dental caries and halitosis (oral malodour). Clinical studies have shown that probiotics when allied to conventional periodontal treatment can ameliorate microbial dysbiosis and produce significant improvement in clinical indicators of disease. However, this effect is often not maintained by the host after the end of probiotic use. Current probiotics also show limited effects in treating caries and halitosis. Novel approaches based up on replacement therapy and using highly abundant health-associated oral species, including nitrate-reducing bacteria, have been proposed to improve persistence of probiotic strains and maintain oral health benefits. Probiotics have potential in the management of multifactorial diseases such as the periodontal diseases and caries, by more effectively addressing the host-microbial interface to restore homeostasis that may not be achieved with conventional treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 253 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Researcher 16 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 113 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 117 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#869,177
of 24,524,436 outputs
Outputs from Current Oral Health Reports
#5
of 84 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,584
of 331,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Oral Health Reports
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,524,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.