| Title |
Habitat selection in the tropical polychaeteSpirobranchus giganteus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, February 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01313163 |
| Authors |
W. Hunte, J. R. Marsden, B. E. Conlin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 68% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#953,556
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#99
of 3,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331
of 58,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them