↓ Skip to main content

Clinical skills of veterinary students – a cross-sectional study of the self-concept and exposure to skills training in Hannover, Germany

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Clinical skills of veterinary students – a cross-sectional study of the self-concept and exposure to skills training in Hannover, Germany
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12917-014-0302-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanja Rösch, Elisabeth Schaper, Andrea Tipold, Martin R Fischer, Marc Dilly, Jan P Ehlers

Abstract

BackgroundStudents of veterinary medicine should achieve basic professional competences required to practise their profession. A main focus of veterinary education is on developing clinical skills.The present study used the guidelines of the ¿Day-One Skills¿ list of European Association of Establishments for Veterinary Education (EAEVE) to create an online questionnaire for assessing the skills acquired by students at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover (TiHo). The theoretical and practical veterinary knowledge levels of the students and postgraduates are determined and compared.ResultsIn two batches, 607 people responded (response batch 1, 23.78%; response batch 2, 23.83%). From 49 defined skills, 28 are actually practised during training at the university and 21 activities are known only theoretically. Furthermore, the students showed great willingness to use simulators and models in a clinical skills lab.ConclusionsThe results of this survey highlight that the opening of a clinical skills lab at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover and its incorporation into the study programme are ideal tools to promote practical competences and foster the motivation to learn.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 23%
Student > Master 11 13%
Other 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 32 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,518,394
of 24,489,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#961
of 3,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,304
of 362,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#33
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,489,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.