↓ Skip to main content

A Community Long-Term Hotline Therapeutic Intervention Model for Coping with the Threat and Trauma of War and Terror

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
A Community Long-Term Hotline Therapeutic Intervention Model for Coping with the Threat and Trauma of War and Terror
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10597-014-9786-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Gelkopf, Sigal Haimov, Liron Lapid

Abstract

Long-term tele-counseling can potentially be a potent intervention mode in war- and terror-related community crisis situations. We aimed to examine a unique long-term telephone-administered intervention, targeting community trauma-related crisis situations by use of various techniques and approaches. 142 participants were evaluated using a non-intrusive by-proxy methodology appraising counselors' standard verbatim reports. Various background measures and elements in the intervention were quantitatively assessed, along with symptomatology and functioning at the onset and end of intervention. About 1/4 of the wide variety of clients called for someone else in addition to themselves, and most called due to a past event rather than a present crisis situation. The intervention successfully reduced posttraumatic stress symptoms and improved functioning. Most interventions included psychosocial education with additional elements, e.g., self-help tools, and almost 60 % included also in-depth processes. In sum, tele-counseling might be a viable and effective intervention model for community-related traumatic stress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 25%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Social Sciences 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2015.
All research outputs
#13,344,161
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#634
of 1,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,965
of 356,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#13
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.