↓ Skip to main content

Involvement of low- and middle-income countries in randomized controlled trial publications in oncology

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Involvement of low- and middle-income countries in randomized controlled trial publications in oncology
Published in
Globalization and Health, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12992-014-0083-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janice C Wong, Kimberly A Fernandes, Shubarna Amin, Zarnie Lwin, Monika K Krzyzanowska

Abstract

BackgroundWe describe trends in participation by investigators from low- and middle-income countries (LMCs) in publications describing oncology randomized control trials (RCTs) over a decade.MethodsWe used Medline to identify RCTs published in English from 1998 to 2008 evaluating treatment in lung, breast, colorectal, stomach and liver cancers. Data on author affiliations, authorship roles, trial characteristics, funding and interventions were extracted from each article. Countries were stratified as low-, middle- or high-income using World Bank data. Interventions were categorized as requiring basic, limited, enhanced or maximal resources as per the Breast Health Global Initiative classification. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with authorship by investigators from LMCs.Results454 publications were identified. Proportion of articles with at least one LMC author increased over time from 20% in 1998 to 29% in 2008 (p¿=¿0.01), but almost all LMC authors were from middle-income countries. Proportion of articles with at least one LMC author was higher among articles that explicitly reported recruitment in at least one LMC vs those that did not (76% vs 13%). Among 87 articles (19%) that involved authors from LMCs, 17% had LMC authors as first or corresponding authors, and 67% evaluated interventions requiring enhanced or maximal resources. Factors associated with LMC authorship included industry funding (OR¿=¿3.54, p¿=¿0.0001), placebo comparator arm (OR¿=¿2.57, p¿=¿0.02) and palliative intent treatment (OR¿=¿4.00, p¿=¿0.0003).ConclusionAn increasing number of publications describing oncology RCTs involve authors from LMC countries but primarily in non-leadership roles in industry-funded trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 28%
Unspecified 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,735,364
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#1,008
of 1,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,988
of 354,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#19
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.