↓ Skip to main content

Which transposable elements are active in the human genome?

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Genetics, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
403 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
571 Mendeley
citeulike
15 CiteULike
connotea
5 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which transposable elements are active in the human genome?
Published in
Trends in Genetics, February 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan E. Mills, E. Andrew Bennett, Rebecca C. Iskow, Scott E. Devine

Abstract

Although a large proportion (44%) of the human genome is occupied by transposons and transposon-like repetitive elements, only a small proportion (<0.05%) of these elements remain active today. Recent evidence indicates that approximately 35-40 subfamilies of Alu, L1 and SVA elements (and possibly HERV-K elements) remain actively mobile in the human genome. These active transposons are of great interest because they continue to produce genetic diversity in human populations and also cause human diseases by integrating into genes. In this review, we examine these active human transposons and explore mechanistic factors that influence their mobilization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 571 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 5 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 540 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 149 26%
Researcher 108 19%
Student > Bachelor 74 13%
Student > Master 62 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 4%
Other 77 13%
Unknown 77 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 246 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 157 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 4%
Computer Science 13 2%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 36 6%
Unknown 86 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,310,838
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Genetics
#903
of 2,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,523
of 93,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Genetics
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.