↓ Skip to main content

Molecular evolution of an oligomeric biocatalyst functioning in lysine biosynthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Molecular evolution of an oligomeric biocatalyst functioning in lysine biosynthesis
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12551-017-0350-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatiana P. Soares da Costa, Belinda M. Abbott, Anthony R. Gendall, Santosh Panjikar, Matthew A. Perugini

Abstract

Dihydrodipicolinate synthase (DHDPS) is critical to the production of lysine through the diaminopimelate (DAP) pathway. Elucidation of the function, regulation and structure of this key class I aldolase has been the focus of considerable study in recent years, given that the dapA gene encoding DHDPS has been found to be essential to bacteria and plants. Allosteric inhibition by lysine is observed for DHDPS from plants and some bacterial species, the latter requiring a histidine or glutamate at position 56 (Escherichia coli numbering) over a basic amino acid. Structurally, two DHDPS monomers form the active site, which binds pyruvate and (S)-aspartate β-semialdehyde, with most dimers further dimerising to form a tetrameric arrangement around a solvent-filled centre cavity. The architecture and behaviour of these dimer-of-dimers is explored in detail, including biophysical studies utilising analytical ultracentrifugation, small-angle X-ray scattering and macromolecular crystallography that show bacterial DHDPS tetramers adopt a head-to-head quaternary structure, compared to the back-to-back arrangement observed for plant DHDPS enzymes. Finally, the potential role of pyruvate in providing substrate-mediated stabilisation of DHDPS is considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 30%
Chemistry 4 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,300,802
of 23,810,331 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#52
of 830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,678
of 443,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#3
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,810,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 830 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.