You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Eliciting Personhood Within Clinical Practice: Effects on Patients, Families, and Health Care Providers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain & Symptom Management, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.11.291 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Harvey Max Chochinov, Susan McClement, Thomas Hack, Genevieve Thompson, Brenden Dufault, Mike Harlos |
Abstract |
Failure to acknowledged personhood is often the cause of patient and family dissatisfaction. We developed the Patient Dignity Question (PDQ) as a simple means of inquiring about personhood: "What do I need to know about you as a person to give you the best care possible?" |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 16% |
United States | 9 | 13% |
Canada | 9 | 13% |
Netherlands | 4 | 6% |
Ireland | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Bahrain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 29 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 41 | 60% |
Scientists | 13 | 19% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 155 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 17% |
Researcher | 15 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Other | 31 | 20% |
Unknown | 31 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 8% |
Psychology | 11 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 6 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 6% |
Unknown | 39 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#721,999
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain & Symptom Management
#104
of 4,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,470
of 349,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain & Symptom Management
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.