↓ Skip to main content

Eliciting Personhood Within Clinical Practice: Effects on Patients, Families, and Health Care Providers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain & Symptom Management, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
68 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eliciting Personhood Within Clinical Practice: Effects on Patients, Families, and Health Care Providers
Published in
Journal of Pain & Symptom Management, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.11.291
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harvey Max Chochinov, Susan McClement, Thomas Hack, Genevieve Thompson, Brenden Dufault, Mike Harlos

Abstract

Failure to acknowledged personhood is often the cause of patient and family dissatisfaction. We developed the Patient Dignity Question (PDQ) as a simple means of inquiring about personhood: "What do I need to know about you as a person to give you the best care possible?"

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 155 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Student > Bachelor 27 17%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 11 7%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 48 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 21%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Psychology 11 7%
Arts and Humanities 6 4%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#721,999
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain & Symptom Management
#104
of 4,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,470
of 349,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain & Symptom Management
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.