| Title |
Toward predicting research proposal success
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-017-2609-2 |
| Authors |
Kevin W. Boyack, Caleb Smith, Richard Klavans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Romania | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Professor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 10% |
| Engineering | 7 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,506,298
of 24,384,616 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#694
of 2,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,974
of 448,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#15
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,384,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.