↓ Skip to main content

Positive mood broadens visual attention to positive stimuli

Overview of attention for article published in Motivation and Emotion, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
244 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
Title
Positive mood broadens visual attention to positive stimuli
Published in
Motivation and Emotion, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11031-006-9021-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather A. Wadlinger, Derek M. Isaacowitz

Abstract

In an attempt to investigate the impact of positive emotions on visual attention within the context of Fredrickson's (1998) broaden-and-build model, eye tracking was used in two studies to measure visual attentional preferences of college students (n=58, n=26) to emotional pictures. Half of each sample experienced induced positive mood immediately before viewing slides of three similarly-valenced images, in varying central-peripheral arrays. Attentional breadth was determined by measuring the percentage viewing time to peripheral images as well as by the number of visual saccades participants made per slide. Consistent with Fredrickson's theory, the first study showed that individuals induced into positive mood fixated more on peripheral stimuli than did control participants; however, this only held true for highly-valenced positive stimuli. Participants under induced positive mood also made more frequent saccades for slides of neutral and positive valence. A second study showed that these effects were not simply due to differences in emotional arousal between stimuli. Selective attentional broadening to positive stimuli may act both to facilitate later building of resources as well as to maintain current positive affective states.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Portugal 3 <1%
Poland 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 369 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 20%
Student > Master 62 16%
Researcher 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 7%
Other 61 15%
Unknown 65 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 224 57%
Neuroscience 17 4%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 3%
Computer Science 11 3%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 74 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,482,582
of 24,742,536 outputs
Outputs from Motivation and Emotion
#180
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,801
of 77,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Motivation and Emotion
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,742,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.