↓ Skip to main content

Comorbidities and medication use in patients with a recent clinical fracture at the Fracture Liaison Service

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Comorbidities and medication use in patients with a recent clinical fracture at the Fracture Liaison Service
Published in
Osteoporosis International, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00198-017-4290-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Vranken, C. E. Wyers, R. Y. Van der Velde, H. M. Janzing, S. Kaarsemaker, P. P. Geusens, J. P. Van den Bergh

Abstract

In this cross-sectional study, two-thirds of Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) patients had comorbidities and medications associated with increased bone- or fall-related fracture risk. Bone-related and fall-related fracture risk (BRR and FRR) were associated with age and fracture type, but not with gender or BMD. Systematic evaluation of these factors leads to a more profound assessment in FLS care. This study is a systematic evaluation of comorbidities and medications associated with increased fracture risk in patients aged 50-90 years with a recent fracture visiting the FLS. In this cross-sectional cohort study, comorbidities were classified according to ICD-10 and medications according to the Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and further categorized into those associated BRR and FRR. Of 1282 patients (72% women; 65 ± 9 years), 53% had at least one BRR, 46% had at least one FRR, and 66% at least one BRR and/or FRR. At least one BRR, as well as at least one FRR were associated with age, BMI, and fracture type, but not with gender or BMD. The proportion of patients with only BRR (± 20%) or only FRR (± 10%) was similar among ages, gender, BMI, fracture type, and BMD. The combination of at least one BRR and at least one FRR was significantly associated with age, BMI, and major fractures, but not with gender or BMD. Comorbidities and medications associated with increased fracture risk are present in two-thirds of patients visiting the FLS. In addition, the proportion of patients having a combination of BRR and FRR increased significantly with age, BMI, and fracture severity. This indicates that systematic evaluation of these factors is important for a more profound assessment of subsequent fracture risk in FLS care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 23%
Student > Bachelor 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 21 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#5,698,212
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#977
of 3,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,019
of 438,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#19
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.