You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A medieval case of digitalis poisoning: the sudden death of Cangrande della Scala, lord of verona (1291–1329)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jas.2014.12.005 |
| Authors |
Gino Fornaciari, Valentina Giuffra, Federica Bortolotti, Rossella Gottardo, Silvia Marvelli, Marco Marchesini, Silvia Marinozzi, Antonio Fornaciari, Giorgio Brocco, Franco Tagliaro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Belgium | 1 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#595,621
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#152
of 2,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,645
of 361,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#4
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.