You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Local loss and spatial homogenization of plant diversity reduce ecosystem multifunctionality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-017-0395-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yann Hautier, Forest Isbell, Elizabeth T. Borer, Eric W. Seabloom, W. Stanley Harpole, Eric M. Lind, Andrew S. MacDougall, Carly J. Stevens, Peter B. Adler, Juan Alberti, Jonathan D. Bakker, Lars A. Brudvig, Yvonne M. Buckley, Marc Cadotte, Maria C. Caldeira, Enrique J. Chaneton, Chengjin Chu, Pedro Daleo, Christopher R. Dickman, John M. Dwyer, Anu Eskelinen, Philip A. Fay, Jennifer Firn, Nicole Hagenah, Helmut Hillebrand, Oscar Iribarne, Kevin P. Kirkman, Johannes M. H. Knops, Kimberly J. La Pierre, Rebecca L. McCulley, John W. Morgan, Meelis Pärtel, Jesus Pascual, Jodi N. Price, Suzanne M. Prober, Anita C. Risch, Mahesh Sankaran, Martin Schuetz, Rachel J. Standish, Risto Virtanen, Glenda M. Wardle, Laura Yahdjian, Andy Hector |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 13% |
| Australia | 14 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 10% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| France | 5 | 4% |
| Sweden | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| Finland | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 75 | 63% |
| Scientists | 39 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 425 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 20% |
| Researcher | 67 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 69 | 16% |
| Unknown | 88 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 185 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 98 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 3% |
| Unknown | 111 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#652,954
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#1,029
of 2,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,544
of 448,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#60
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.