| Title |
Vasopressors for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00063-017-0378-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Prondzinsky, K. Hirsch, L. Wachsmuth, M. Buerke, S. Unverzagt |
| Abstract |
Several international evidence-based guidelines reveal the lack of evidence on the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) for all recommended therapies. We included 6 studies with 842 eligible patients and one ongoing study. Three different adrenergic agents (norepinephrine, dopamine, epinephrine), vasopressin and the NOS inhibitor tilarginine were compared in 4 different combinations. On the small basis of all available evidence we can state that there is no evidence to use tilarginene, some evidence to avoid dopamine due to increased rates of arrhythmias, but some evidence, which suggests to prefer norepinephrine in comparison to epinephrine as vasopressor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,577,751
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin
#198
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,994
of 439,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.