↓ Skip to main content

ERP evidence for temporal independence of set size and object updating in object substitution masking

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
ERP evidence for temporal independence of set size and object updating in object substitution masking
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, December 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13414-017-1459-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine M. Salahub, Stephen M. Emrich

Abstract

To keep track of dynamically changing objects in one's environment, it is necessary to individuate them from other objects, both temporally and spatially. Spatially, objects can be selected from nearby distractors using selective attention. Temporally, object updating processes incorporate new information into existing representations over time. Both of these processes have been implicated in a type of visual masking called object-substitution masking (OSM). Previous studies have found that the number of distractors (impacting selective attention) interacts with the strength of OSM. However, it has been suggested that this interaction is an artifact of ceiling performance at low set sizes, rather than necessitating a failure of attention during masking. Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we examined whether set size and masking interact as measured by markers of selective attention (N2pc) and visual working memory consolidation/maintenance (SPCN). Set size was found to affect the N2pc (200-350 ms) and late SPCN (500-650 ms), reflecting increased demands on selective attention and unnecessary storage respectively. An early window of the SPCN (350-500 ms) was affected by masking, suggesting that OSM influences object consolidation processes in this window, independent of the number of distractors. Overall, it was found that selective attention and visual awareness are dissociable neural processes in OSM, and that they are independently affected by set size and masking manipulations. Moreover, we found that the early SPCN may reflect disruptions to object consolidation, potentially revealing a neural mechanism supporting an object individuation-through-updating account of OSM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 45%
Neuroscience 5 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,856,318
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#316
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,661
of 446,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.