↓ Skip to main content

Increasing Reporting of Adverse Events to Improve the Educational Value of the Morbidity and Mortality Conference

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increasing Reporting of Adverse Events to Improve the Educational Value of the Morbidity and Mortality Conference
Published in
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, November 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Terri P. McVeigh, Peadar S. Waters, Ruth Murphy, Gerrard T. O'Donoghue, Ray McLaughlin, Michael J. Kerin

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a validated complication proforma on surgical Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) conference reporting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
Uruguay 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Researcher 10 14%
Other 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 20 27%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2014.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#3,290
of 4,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,051
of 201,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.