↓ Skip to main content

An improved liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method for quantification of dexmedetomidine concentrations in samples of human plasma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An improved liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method for quantification of dexmedetomidine concentrations in samples of human plasma
Published in
Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.12.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seyed Mojtaba Moosavi, Kiran Shekar, John F. Fraser, Maree T. Smith, Sussan Ghassabian

Abstract

Dexmedetomidine (DMET) is a sedative, analgesic and anxiolytic with minimum adverse respiratory effects. An LC-MS/MS bioanalytical method has been developed and validated to accurately measure DMET concentrations in samples of human plasma. The method overcomes difficulties in the extraction and quantification of DMET due to the fact that it binds strongly to glass and plastic tubes, as well as solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridges. Human plasma (50 μL) was mixed with the internal standard (IS) (DMET-d4) solution (100 μL) and 0.1% formic acid (50 μL) and extracted using Oasis HLB 1 CC (30 mg) solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridges (Waters®). The glass tubes were coated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) 0.5% (20 μL) before eluting DMET and the IS. After evaporation under nitrogen at room temperature, the analytes were reconstituted in 20% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid in water and transferred to silanized glass vials. An electrospray ionisation (ESI) mass spectrometry method in positive mode was created and the precursor/product transitions (m/z) were 201.1 → 95.0 (DMET) and 204.9 → 99.0 (IS). The method was robust and fully validated based on the 2012 EMEA guideline for bioanalytical method validation in the concentration range of 0.5-20 ng/mL. Using this assay, we showed that DMET binds strongly to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) circuits, consistent with expectations for small lipophilic compounds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Researcher 4 33%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 33%
Unspecified 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences
#3,153
of 5,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,939
of 445,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences
#20
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.