↓ Skip to main content

Insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function after carbohydrate oral loading in hip replacement surgery: A double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Nutrition, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function after carbohydrate oral loading in hip replacement surgery: A double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial
Published in
Clinical Nutrition, August 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.08.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Ljunggren, Robert G. Hahn, Thomas Nyström

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 19%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 26 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,449,732
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nutrition
#1,608
of 3,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,227
of 226,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nutrition
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.