↓ Skip to main content

Master regulators in plant glucose signaling networks

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Biology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
Master regulators in plant glucose signaling networks
Published in
Journal of Plant Biology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12374-014-0902-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jen Sheen

Abstract

The daily life of photosynthetic plants revolves around sugar production, transport, storage and utilization, and the complex sugar metabolic and signaling networks integrate internal regulators and environmental cues to govern and sustain plant growth and survival. Although diverse sugar signals have emerged as pivotal regulators from embryogenesis to senescence, glucose is the most ancient and conserved regulatory signal that controls gene and protein expression, cell-cycle progression, central and secondary metabolism, as well as growth and developmental programs. Glucose signals are perceived and transduced by two principal mechanisms: direct sensing through glucose sensors and indirect sensing via a variety of energy and metabolite sensors. This review focuses on the comparative and functional analyses of three glucose-modulated master regulators in Arabidopsis thaliana, the hexokinase1 (HXK1) glucose sensor, the energy sensor kinases KIN10/KIN11 inactivated by glucose, and the glucose-activated target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase. These regulators are evolutionarily conserved, but have evolved universal and unique regulatory wiring and functions in plants and animals. They form protein complexes with multiple partners as regulators or effectors to serve distinct functions in different subcellular locales and organs, and play integrative and complementary roles from cellular signaling and metabolism to development in the plant glucose signaling networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 229 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 29%
Researcher 38 16%
Student > Master 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 47 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 134 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 15%
Chemistry 5 2%
Engineering 2 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 51 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,792,641
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Biology
#69
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,212
of 223,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them