↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D in the prevention, prediction and treatment of neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases

Overview of attention for article published in EPMA Journal, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D in the prevention, prediction and treatment of neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases
Published in
EPMA Journal, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13167-017-0120-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priscilla Koduah, Friedemann Paul, Jan-Markus Dörr

Abstract

Vitamin D research has gained increased attention in recent times due to its roles beyond bone health and calcium homeostasis, such as immunomodulation. In some parts of the brain and on immune cells, vitamin D hydroxylating enzymes and its receptors are located. Epidemiological evidence demonstrates that deficiency of Vitamin D is relevant for disease risk and course in multiple sclerosis (MS) and presumably also in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although the exact mechanism underlying vitamin D effects in these diseases remains widely unexplored, human and animal studies continue to provide some hints. While the majority of vitamin D researchers so far speculate that vitamin D may be involved in disease pathogenesis, others could not show any association although none have reported that sufficient vitamin D worsens disease progression. The studies presented in this review suggest that whether vitamin D may have beneficial effects in disease course or not, may be dependent on factors such as ethnicity, gender, diet, vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms and sunlight exposure. We here review the possible role of vitamin D in the pathogenesis and disease course of MS, NMOSD, PD, and AD and potential therapeutic effects of vitamin D supplementation which may be relevant for predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine. We suggest areas to consider in vitamin D research for future studies and recommend the need to supplement patients with low vitamin D levels below 30 ng/ml to at least reach sufficient levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 196 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 66 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 18%
Neuroscience 18 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 74 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,976,997
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from EPMA Journal
#112
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,145
of 328,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EPMA Journal
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.