↓ Skip to main content

An intentional vocalization draws others’ attention: A playback experiment with wild chimpanzees

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
An intentional vocalization draws others’ attention: A playback experiment with wild chimpanzees
Published in
Animal Cognition, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10071-014-0827-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Crockford, Roman M. Wittig, Klaus Zuberbühler

Abstract

A vital step in the evolution of language is likely to have been when signalers explicitly intended to direct recipients' attention to external objects with the use of referential signals. Although animal signals can direct the attention of others to external events, such as in monkey predator alarm calls, there is little evidence that this is the result of an intention to inform the recipient. Two recent studies, however, indicate that the production of chimpanzee quiet alarm calls, given to snakes, complies with some standard behavioral markers of intentional signaling, such as gaze alternation. But it is currently unknown whether the calls alone direct receivers' attention to the threat. To address this, we carried out a playback experiment with free-ranging chimpanzees in Budongo Forest, Uganda, using a within-subjects design. From a hidden speaker, we broadcast either quiet alarm 'hoos' ('alert hoos') or acoustically distinguishable hoos produced while resting ('rest hoos') and found a significant increase in search behavior after 'alert' compared with 'rest' hoos, with subjects monitoring either the call provider or the area near the call provider. In sum, chimpanzee 'alert hoos' represent a plausible case of an intentionally produced animal vocalization (other studies) that refers recipients to signalers and/or to an external event (this study).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 110 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 10 9%
Professor 6 5%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 33%
Psychology 28 24%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 26 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,676,430
of 24,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#376
of 1,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,226
of 362,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.