↓ Skip to main content

Crohn's disease management after intestinal resection: a randomised trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
42 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
475 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Crohn's disease management after intestinal resection: a randomised trial
Published in
The Lancet, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61908-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter De Cruz, Michael A Kamm, Amy L Hamilton, Kathryn J Ritchie, Efrosinia O Krejany, Alexandra Gorelik, Danny Liew, Lani Prideaux, Ian C Lawrance, Jane M Andrews, Peter A Bampton, Peter R Gibson, Miles Sparrow, Rupert W Leong, Timothy H Florin, Richard B Gearry, Graham Radford-Smith, Finlay A Macrae, Henry Debinski, Warwick Selby, Ian Kronborg, Michael J Johnston, Rodney Woods, P Ross Elliott, Sally J Bell, Steven J Brown, William R Connell, Paul V Desmond

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 375 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 16%
Other 54 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 10%
Student > Bachelor 30 8%
Student > Postgraduate 28 7%
Other 91 24%
Unknown 77 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 232 61%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 25 7%
Unknown 89 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#496,318
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#4,625
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,868
of 364,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#70
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.