↓ Skip to main content

TMS evidence for a selective role of the precuneus in source memory retrieval

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioural Brain Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TMS evidence for a selective role of the precuneus in source memory retrieval
Published in
Behavioural Brain Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonia Bonnì, Domenica Veniero, Chiara Mastropasqua, Viviana Ponzo, Carlo Caltagirone, Marco Bozzali, Giacomo Koch

Abstract

The posteromedial cortex including the precuneus (PC) is thought to be involved in episodic memory retrieval. Here we used continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to disentangle the role of the precuneus in the recognition memory process in a sample of healthy subjects. During the encoding phase, subjects were presented with a series of colored pictures. Afterwards, during the retrieval phase, all previously presented items and a sample of new pictures were presented in black, and subjects were asked to indicate whether each item was new or old, and in the latter case to indicate the associated color. cTBS was delivered over PC, posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and vertex before the retrieval phase. The data were analyzed in terms of hits, false alarms, source errors and omissions. cTBS over the precuneus, but not over the PPC or the vertex, induced a selective decrease in source memory errors, indicating an improvement in context retrieval. All the other accuracy measurements were unchanged. These findings suggest a direct implication of the precuneus in successful context-dependent retrieval.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 113 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 35%
Neuroscience 21 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 36 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,204,326
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Behavioural Brain Research
#1,464
of 4,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,534
of 359,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioural Brain Research
#22
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.