↓ Skip to main content

Prophylactic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients with postoperative complications

Overview of attention for article published in Gastric Cancer, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Prophylactic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients with postoperative complications
Published in
Gastric Cancer, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10120-017-0781-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kojiro Eto, Naoki Hiki, Koshi Kumagai, Yoshiaki Shoji, Yasuo Tsuda, Yosuke Kano, Itaru Yasufuku, Yasuhiro Okumura, Masahiro Tsujiura, Satoshi Ida, Souya Nunobe, Manabu Ohashi, Takeshi Sano, Toshiharu Yamaguchi

Abstract

The occurrence of postoperative complications may have a significant negative impact on the prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. The inflammatory response releases systemic cytokines, which may induce residual cancer cell growth. Recently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was found to improve the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer (GC). We hypothesize that when postoperative complications occur after gastrectomy, NAC treatment of micrometastases can prevent residual cancer cell growth. This study included 101 patients who underwent curative resection after NAC for GC from 2005 to 2015. Clinical data, including intraoperative parameters, were collected retrospectively. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared between the patients with complications and those without complications. Of the 101 patients, 35 (34.7%) had grade 2 or higher complications. Among those with complications, the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 63.5 and 58.2% and the 3- and 5-year RFS rates 41.7 and 41.7%, respectively. Among those without complications, the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 65.9 and 56.3% and the 3- and 5-year RFS rates 51.1 and 43.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference in prognosis between the patients with complications and those without complications. Our study is the first to demonstrate the potential of NAC to abolish the poor prognosis induced by postoperative complications after curative resection for GC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Design 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,485,255
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Gastric Cancer
#320
of 602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,756
of 438,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastric Cancer
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 602 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.