↓ Skip to main content

Adult care for Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the UK

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Adult care for Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the UK
Published in
Journal of Neurology, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00415-014-7585-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunil Rodger, Katherine L. Woods, Catherine L. Bladen, Angela Stringer, Julia Vry, Kathrin Gramsch, Janbernd Kirschner, Rachel Thompson, Katharine Bushby, Hanns Lochmüller

Abstract

Survival in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) has increased in recent years due to iterative improvements in care. We describe the results of the CARE-NMD survey of care practices for adults with DMD in the UK in light of international consensus care guidelines. We also compare the UK experience of adult care with the care available to pediatric patients and adults in other European countries (Germany, Denmark, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland). UK adults experience less comprehensive care compared to children in their access to specialized clinics, frequency of cardiac and respiratory assessments, and access to professional physiotherapy. Access to the latter is especially poor when compared to other European adult cohorts. Although the total number of nights in hospital (planned and unplanned admissions) is lower among UK adults than elsewhere in Western Europe, social inclusion lags behind other Western European countries. We observe that attendance at specialized clinic is associated with more frequent cardiac and respiratory assessments among adults, in line with international best practice. Attendance at such clinics in the UK, though comparable to other countries, is still far from universal. With an increasing adult population living with DMD, and cardiac and respiratory failure the leading causes of death in this population, we suggest the need for an urgent improvement in adult access to specialized clinics and to consistent, comprehensive best practice care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 23 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,498,155
of 25,350,078 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#202
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,891
of 365,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#1
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,350,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.