↓ Skip to main content

The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5933-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Fuchshuber, S. Schwaitzberg, D. Jones, S. B. Jones, L. Feldman, M. Munro, T. Robinson, G. Purcell-Jackson, D. Mikami, A. Madani, M. Brunt, B. Dunkin, C. Gugliemi, L. Groah, R. Lim, J. Mischna, C. R. Voyles

Abstract

Adverse events due to energy device use in surgical operating rooms are a daily occurrence. These occur at a rate of approximately 1-2 per 1000 operations. Hundreds of operating room fires occur each year in the United States, some causing severe injury and even mortality. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) therefore created the first comprehensive educational curriculum on the safe use of surgical energy devices, called Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE). This paper describes the history, development, and purpose of this important training program for all members of the operating room team. The databases of SAGES and the FUSE committee as well as personal photographs and documents of members of the FUSE task force were used to establish a brief history of the FUSE program from its inception to its current status. The authors were able to detail all aspects of the history, development, and national as well as global implementation of the third SAGES Fundamentals Program FUSE. The written documentation of the making of FUSE is an important contribution to the history and mission of SAGES and allows the reader to understand the idea, concept, realization, and implementation of the only free online educational tool for physicians on energy devices available today. FUSE is the culmination of the SAGES efforts to recognize gaps in patient safety and develop state-of-the-art educational programs to address those gaps. It is the goal of the FUSE task force to ensure that general FUSE implementation becomes multinational, involving as many countries as possible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Unspecified 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 22 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,784,117
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,383
of 6,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,655
of 440,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#71
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.