↓ Skip to main content

Thoracotomy versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in stage III empyema—an analysis of 217 consecutive patients

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Thoracotomy versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in stage III empyema—an analysis of 217 consecutive patients
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5961-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Reichert, Bernd Pösentrup, Andreas Hecker, Emmanuel Schneck, Jörn Pons-Kühnemann, Florian Augustin, Winfried Padberg, Dietmar Öfner, Johannes Bodner

Abstract

Pleural empyema is an infectious disease of the chest cavity, with a high morbidity and mortality. According to the American Thoracic Society, pleural empyema gets graduated into three stages, with surgery being indicated in intermediate stage II and chronic stage III. Evidence for the feasibility of a minimally-invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic approach in stage III empyema for pulmonary decortication is still little. Retrospective single-center analysis of patients conducted to surgery for chronic stage III pleural empyema from 05/2002 to 04/2014 either by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS, n = 110) or conventional open surgery by thoracotomy (n = 107). Multiple regression analysis and propensity score matching was used to evaluate the influence of operation technique (thoracotomy versus VATS) on the length of post-operative hospitalization. Operation time was longer in the thoracotomy-group (p = 0.0207). Conversion rate from VATS to open surgery by thoracotomy was 4.5%. Post-operative complication- (61 patients in thoracotomy- and 55 patients in VATS-group), recurrence- (3 patients in thoracotomy- and 5 in VATS-group) and mortality-rates (6.5% in thoracotomy- and 9.5% in VATS-group) did not differ between both groups; the length of (post-operative) stay at intensive care unit was longer in the VATS-group (p = 0.0023). Duration of chest tube drainage and prolonged air leak rate were similar among both groups, leading to a similar overall and post-operative length of hospital stay in both groups. Adjusted to clinically and statistically relevant confounders, multiple regression analysis showed an influence of the surgical technique on length of post-operative stay after pair matching of the patients (n = 84 in each group) by propensity score (B = - 0.179 for thoracotomy = 0 and VATS = 1, p = 0.032) leading to a reduction of 0.836 days after a VATS-approach compared to thoracotomy. VATS in late stage (III) pleural empyema is feasible and safe. The decrease in post-operative hospitalization demonstrated by adjusted multiple regression analysis may indicate the minimally-invasive approach being safe, more tolerable for patients, and more effective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 22%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 59%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,369,953
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,282
of 6,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,729
of 440,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#121
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.