| Title |
Imperfect Recall: The Impact of Composite Spending Information Disclosure on Credit Card Spending
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Consumer Policy, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10603-014-9279-8 |
| Authors |
Amit Poddar, Cameron M. Ellis, Timucin Ozcan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Australia | 2 | 12% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 14% |
| Psychology | 5 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2017.
All research outputs
#944,945
of 25,455,127 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Consumer Policy
#11
of 270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,021
of 360,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Consumer Policy
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,455,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.