| Title |
Erratum to: Determination of the distribution of flood forecasting error
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-014-1454-3 |
| Authors |
Junhong Zhang, Lu Chen, Vijay P. Singh, Wenhong Cao, Dangwei Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,792,641
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,268
of 1,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,774
of 253,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#16
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.