↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of Charge Separation Dynamics in Organic Blend Films Employing Fullerene and Perylene Diimide Electron Acceptors

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparison of Charge Separation Dynamics in Organic Blend Films Employing Fullerene and Perylene Diimide Electron Acceptors
Published in
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, December 2014
DOI 10.1021/jz502385n
Pubmed ID
Authors

Safa Shoaee, Florent Deledalle, Pabitra Shakya Tuladhar, Ravichandran Shivanna, Sridhar Rajaram, K. S. Narayan, James R. Durrant

Abstract

We report a comparison of charge carrier dynamics and device performance for low band gap polymer PBDTTT-CT in blends with the fullerene acceptor PC71BM and a PDI derivative with similar electron affinities. Charge separation and recombination dynamics are found to be remarkably similar for these two acceptors, with both blends exhibiting efficient, ultrafast charge separation (time constants of 1.6 and 1.4 ps, respectively). The lower device performance for the PDI acceptor (1.75% compared to 3.5% for the equivalent PC71BM device) is shown to result from slower charge transport, increasing nongeminate recombination losses during charge collection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 6%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 56 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 35%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 19 30%
Chemistry 19 30%
Materials Science 8 13%
Engineering 3 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
#6,466
of 10,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,003
of 359,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
#83
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.