| Title |
Critical review of reporting of the data analysis step in metabolomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Metabolomics, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11306-017-1299-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. C. Considine, G. Thomas, A. L. Boulesteix, A. S. Khashan, L. C. Kenny |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 14% |
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| Ireland | 3 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 50% |
| Scientists | 14 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 24 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,438,292
of 24,909,203 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#46
of 1,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,368
of 449,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,909,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.