| Title |
Effects of grazing and prescribed fire on resource selection and nest survival of upland sandpipers in an experimental landscape
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape Ecology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10980-014-0133-9 |
| Authors |
Brett K. Sandercock, Matilde Alfaro-Barrios, Ashley E. Casey, Tracey N. Johnson, Tony W. Mong, Karan J. Odom, Khara M. Strum, Virginia L. Winder |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,621,501
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#508
of 1,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,194
of 353,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#6
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.