↓ Skip to main content

Hypertension in children and adolescents: epidemiology and natural history

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley
Title
Hypertension in children and adolescents: epidemiology and natural history
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00467-009-1200-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bonita Falkner

Abstract

Primary hypertension is detectable in children and adolescents and, as in adults, is associated with a positive family history of hypertension, obesity, and life-style factors. Owing to the well-established childhood obesity epidemic, the population prevalence of high blood pressure (BP) in the young is increasing. Hypertension in childhood is commonly associated with other cardiovascular risk factors as well as obesity. Although death and cardiovascular disability do not occur in hypertensive children, intermediate markers of target organ damage, such as left ventricular hypertrophy, thickening of the carotid vessel wall, retinal vascular changes, and even subtle cognitive changes, are detectable in children and adolescents with high BP. Considering the rates of verified hypertension (>3%) and pre-hypertension (>3%) in asymptomatic children and adolescents, high BP should be considered a common long-term health problem in childhood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Unknown 323 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 15%
Student > Bachelor 48 14%
Student > Postgraduate 34 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 10%
Researcher 29 9%
Other 74 22%
Unknown 64 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 147 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 6%
Sports and Recreations 12 4%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 74 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,051,130
of 25,107,281 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#165
of 4,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,954
of 99,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,107,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.