You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deliberative democracy and cancer screening consent: a randomised control trial of the effect of a community jury on men's knowledge about and intentions to participate in PSA screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005691 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rae Thomas, Paul Glasziou, Lucie Rychetnik, Geraldine Mackenzie, Robert Gardiner, Jenny Doust |
| Abstract |
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is controversial. A community jury allows presentation of complex information and may clarify how participants view screening after being well-informed. We examined whether participating in a community jury had an effect on men's knowledge about and their intention to participate in PSA screening. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 6 | 16% |
| Australia | 6 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 51% |
| Scientists | 11 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#883,321
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#1,515
of 25,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,094
of 361,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#24
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.