↓ Skip to main content

FRET-based analysis of protein-nucleic acid interactions by genetically incorporating a fluorescent amino acid

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
FRET-based analysis of protein-nucleic acid interactions by genetically incorporating a fluorescent amino acid
Published in
Amino Acids, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00726-014-1900-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyojin Park, Heejin Kang, Wooseok Ko, Wonkoo Lee, Kyubong Jo, Hyun Soo Lee

Abstract

Protein-nucleic acid interaction is an important process in many biological phenomena. In this study, a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based protein-DNA binding assay has been developed, in which a fluorescent amino acid is genetically incorporated into a DNA-binding protein. A coumarin-containing amino acid was incorporated into a DNA-binding protein, and the mutant protein specifically produced a FRET signal upon binding to its cognate DNA labeled with a fluorophore. The protein-DNA binding affinity was then measured under equilibrium conditions. This method is advantageous for studying protein-nucleic acid interactions, because it is performed under equilibrium conditions, technically easy, and applicable to any nucleic acid-binding protein.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 29%
Chemistry 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,313,289
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#1,015
of 1,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,807
of 353,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#21
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.