↓ Skip to main content

Intraspecific variation of anatomical and chemical defensive traits in Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) as factors in susceptibility to the pinewood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus)

Overview of attention for article published in Trees, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Intraspecific variation of anatomical and chemical defensive traits in Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) as factors in susceptibility to the pinewood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus)
Published in
Trees, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00468-014-1143-6
Authors

Rafael Zas, Xoaquín Moreira, Miguel Ramos, Marta R. M. Lima, Marta Nunes da Silva, Alejandro Solla, Marta W. Vasconcelos, Luis Sampedro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 40%
Environmental Science 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#16,060,819
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#280
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,155
of 357,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.