↓ Skip to main content

Ultra-processed Food Intake and Obesity: What Really Matters for Health—Processing or Nutrient Content?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Obesity Reports, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 427)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
134 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
82 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
6 Facebook pages
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
293 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1031 Mendeley
Title
Ultra-processed Food Intake and Obesity: What Really Matters for Health—Processing or Nutrient Content?
Published in
Current Obesity Reports, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13679-017-0285-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer M. Poti, Bianca Braga, Bo Qin

Abstract

The aim of this narrative review was to summarize and critique recent evidence evaluating the association between ultra-processed food intake and obesity. Four of five studies found that higher purchases or consumption of ultra-processed food was associated with overweight/obesity. Additional studies reported relationships between ultra-processed food intake and higher fasting glucose, metabolic syndrome, increases in total and LDL cholesterol, and risk of hypertension. It remains unclear whether associations can be attributed to processing itself or the nutrient content of ultra-processed foods. Only three of nine studies used a prospective design, and the potential for residual confounding was high. Recent research provides fairly consistent support for the association of ultra-processed food intake with obesity and related cardiometabolic outcomes. There is a clear need for further studies, particularly those using longitudinal designs and with sufficient control for confounding, to potentially confirm these findings in different populations and to determine whether ultra-processed food consumption is associated with obesity independent of nutrient content.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,031 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1031 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 153 15%
Student > Master 118 11%
Researcher 71 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 6%
Student > Postgraduate 43 4%
Other 147 14%
Unknown 433 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 171 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 135 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 5%
Social Sciences 21 2%
Other 134 13%
Unknown 462 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#13,027
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Current Obesity Reports
#2
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194
of 339,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Obesity Reports
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them