↓ Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of lactic acidosis induced by linezolid and vancomycin therapy using cohort and case–control studies of incidence and associated risk factors

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Comparative analysis of lactic acidosis induced by linezolid and vancomycin therapy using cohort and case–control studies of incidence and associated risk factors
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00228-017-2377-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nobuaki Mori, Yoshio Kamimura, Yuki Kimura, Shoko Hirose, Yasuko Aoki, Seiji Bito

Abstract

Lactic acidosis is a rare complication of linezolid (LZD) therapy, and its incidence and risk factors remain unknown. This study aimed to compare the incidence of LZD-associated lactic acidosis (LALA) and vancomycin (VAN)-associated lactic acidosis (VALA) and investigate the risk factors for LALA. We performed a retrospective cohort study using propensity score-matched analyses comparing the incidence of lactic acidosis between LZD and VAN therapy. We included adult patients administered LZD or VAN between April 2014 and March 2016 and extracted patient baseline data. In a case-control study, we identified the risk factors of lactic acidosis in patients treated with LZD. We identified 94 and 313 patients who were administered LZD and VAN, respectively. The incidence of lactic acidosis after LZD and VAN therapy was 10.6 and 0.3%, respectively. After propensity score-matched analyses, the incidence of lactic acidosis with LZD therapy was significantly higher than that with VAN therapy [10.0% (8/80) vs. 0% (0/80), respectively; risk difference, 0.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.03-0.17; p = 0.004]. In a case-control study, 10 patients with LALA were matched to 20 non-lactic acidosis patients by age and sex. Patients with LALA were more likely to have renal insufficiency than non-lactic acidosis patients that were in the univariate analysis (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% CI, 1.0-84.4; p = 0.02). This study indicates that LALA occurs more frequently than VALA does and is associated with renal insufficiency. Therefore, close monitoring of kidney function and serum lactate is recommended during LZD therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Unknown 11 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#13,222,401
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#1,866
of 2,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,953
of 439,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#23
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.