↓ Skip to main content

Discourse ethics for computer ethics: a heuristic for engaged dialogical reflection

Overview of attention for article published in Ethics and Information Technology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Discourse ethics for computer ethics: a heuristic for engaged dialogical reflection
Published in
Ethics and Information Technology, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10676-014-9359-0
Authors

William Rehg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 19 28%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 10%
Philosophy 6 9%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2015.
All research outputs
#19,383,782
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Ethics and Information Technology
#378
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,382
of 359,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethics and Information Technology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.