↓ Skip to main content

Sustained mitogenic effect on K562 human chronic myelogenous leukemia cells by dietary lectin, jacalin

Overview of attention for article published in Glycoconjugate Journal, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Sustained mitogenic effect on K562 human chronic myelogenous leukemia cells by dietary lectin, jacalin
Published in
Glycoconjugate Journal, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10719-016-9725-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. Lavanya, Neesar Ahmed, Md Khurshid Alam Khan, Shazia Jamal

Abstract

Dietary lectins have been shown to affect the proliferation of human cancer cell lines. The anti-proliferative effects of lectins from varied sources have been extensively studied and in some cases, the underlying mechanism has been explored. Except for peanut agglutinin (PNA), the mitogenic effects of no other lectins have been studied in detail. In the present study, we have shown that jacalin, lectin purified from jackfruit (Artocarpus integrifolia) seeds act as a mitogen for K562, the Bcr-Abl expressing erythroleukemia cell line (K562) and the effect was found to be dose dependent. K562 cells remained in the proliferative state for a longer period even after the withdrawal of jacalin stimulation, thus jacalin was found to induce sustained mitogenic effect on K562 cells. Further, conditioned media from K562 cells treated with jacalin were observed to have the similar mitogenic effect even in the presence of galactose. Importantly, galactose which is a known ligand for jacalin will interact with functionally active jacalin present in the conditioned media and neutralise its effect. In addition, jacalin treatment also resulted in increased mRNA expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, IL-6 and IFN-γ. Our results indicate that jacalin induces secretion of soluble molecules, which maybe responsible for this observed increased proliferation of K562 cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 17%
Chemical Engineering 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Glycoconjugate Journal
#716
of 929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,154
of 355,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Glycoconjugate Journal
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 929 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.