↓ Skip to main content

大阪市天王寺公園の管理の変遷と有料化が及ぼした野宿者排除の影響に関する研究

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 175)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
大阪市天王寺公園の管理の変遷と有料化が及ぼした野宿者排除の影響に関する研究
Published in
Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, March 1996
DOI 10.5632/jila.59.5_213
Authors

永橋 為介, 土肥 真人

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,555,805
of 24,823,556 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#1
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#456
of 27,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,823,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them