You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health Inequity in People with Intellectual Disabilities: From Evidence to Action Applying an Appreciative Inquiry Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jar.12130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenneken Naaldenberg, Roger Banks, Nick Lennox, Hélène Ouellette‐Kunz, Marijke Meijer, Henny van Schrojenstein Lantman‐de Valk |
| Abstract |
The current understanding of health inequities in people with intellectual disabilities does not readily translate into improvements in health status or health care. To identify opportunities for action, the 2013 IASSIDD health SIRG conference organized ten intensive workshops. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 20% |
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 14% |
| Psychology | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,554,523
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
#132
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,561
of 362,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.