↓ Skip to main content

Implications of Magnesium Deficiency in Type 2 Diabetes: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Trace Element Research, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Implications of Magnesium Deficiency in Type 2 Diabetes: A Review
Published in
Biological Trace Element Research, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12011-009-8465-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dharam P. Chaudhary, Rajeshwar Sharma, Devi D. Bansal

Abstract

Magnesium is the fourth most abundant cation in the body and plays an important physiological role in many of its functions. It plays a fundamental role as a cofactor in various enzymatic reactions involving energy metabolism. Magnesium is a cofactor of various enzymes in carbohydrate oxidation and plays an important role in glucose transporting mechanism of the cell membrane. It is also involved in insulin secretion, binding, and activity. Magnesium deficiency and hypomagnesemia can result from a wide variety of causes, including deficient magnesium intake, gastrointestinal, and renal losses. Chronic magnesium deficiency has been associated with the development of insulin resistance. The present review discusses the implications of magnesium deficiency in type 2 diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 2%
South Africa 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 170 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 18%
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Other 12 7%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 42 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Chemistry 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 44 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,522,649
of 24,938,276 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#124
of 2,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,781
of 117,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,938,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.