↓ Skip to main content

“Just a spoonful of sugar...”: import of sialic acid across bacterial cell membranes

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
“Just a spoonful of sugar...”: import of sialic acid across bacterial cell membranes
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12551-017-0343-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel A. North, Christopher R. Horne, James S. Davies, Daniela M. Remus, Andrew C. Muscroft-Taylor, Parveen Goyal, Weixiao Yuan Wahlgren, S. Ramaswamy, Rosmarie Friemann, Renwick C. J. Dobson

Abstract

Eukaryotic cell surfaces are decorated with a complex array of glycoconjugates that are usually capped with sialic acids, a large family of over 50 structurally distinct nine-carbon amino sugars, the most common member of which is N-acetylneuraminic acid. Once made available through the action of neuraminidases, bacterial pathogens and commensals utilise host-derived sialic acid by degrading it for energy or repurposing the sialic acid onto their own cell surface to camouflage the bacterium from the immune system. A functional sialic acid transporter has been shown to be essential for the uptake of sialic acid in a range of human bacterial pathogens and important for host colonisation and persistence. Here, we review the state-of-play in the field with respect to the molecular mechanisms by which these bio-nanomachines transport sialic acids across bacterial cell membranes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 18%
Chemistry 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#13,224,255
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#207
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,883
of 441,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#17
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.